The wonderful thing about our North Star 1672 range is that the figures will do for many different nations armies in the period 1665-1680. This is  because it is a time just before uniforms, and the figures are all dressed in the fashions common amongst soldiers throughout Western Europe.  
This of course includes Britain.  The years covered by our range is called the Restoration Period in  Britain as it was the time the monarchy, represented by Charles II,   was restored after the English Civil War.   It was also the genesis of the British Army. Britain, tired of soldiers  and war, had disbanded much of it’s forces after the Civil War and  Oliver Cromwell’s reign. With the return of Charles II to England in  1660, the units still under arms swore allegiance to the King and  became the senior units of the British Army. Some of the infantry regiments:  Coldstream Guards Grenadier Guards Scots Guards 1st Regiment (Royal Scots) 2nd Regiment (The Queen’s) 3rd Regiment (The Buffs) st
Colour.
NSA1005 - Matabele Warriors in full Regalia
Instead, this informant stated, the "induna" or regimental  commander distributed the hides from which the shields were  made, allowing the bravest warriors first choice, "until the  cowards had to take what was left". As among the Zulus, the  "most honourable" colour was white, usually with a few dark  markings, so presumably the favoured men took these, leaving the predominantly black or brown hides for the others.  According to the same informant units in training had black  shields, replaced by coloured ones when their education was  completed. If this was the case each regiment would present a  mixture of different colours, perhaps with the palest shields in  the front rank. A quick survey of contemporary pictures produces  contradictory evidence. A watercolour by Charles Bell, dated  1835, shows a group of warriors wearing similar headdresses,  which suggests that they belonged to the same regiment, but  of the two shields seen faceon, one is white and the other a  solid dark colour. In 1877 A. A. Anderson painted what he  called "a rough but a correct sketch" of the annual "Inxwala"  dance at Bulawayo, at which Lobengula inspected his troops.  The warriors drawn up for review form three distinct units  distinguished by the colour of the shields visible in the front  rank. Of the one on the right Anderson wrote, "The black  shields form one regiment and is his (ie. Lobengula's)  bodyguard". This is the opposite of what we would expect, but this role was often entrusted to a young regiment in training.  An oil painting, "The Battle of Mbembesi" by J. P.  Macdougall, shows what is probably the "Imbizo" or "Ingubo" regiment engaging in a firefight with a South Africa Company  laager; Macdougall was at the battle, so this is presumably a  fairly accurate representation. Most of the Matabele are firing  rifles and so have discarded their shields, but two shields are  visible in close-up in the foreground. One is white with dark  blotches, and the other is black. White with black spots is  thought to have been the colour associated with the "Imbizo"  regiment, but other elite units like Insuga seem to have carried  mainly black shields.  Shield patterns As any fan of the Zulus knows, the subject of shield patterns  is a complicated and fascinating one; their famous Nguni  cattle come in a staggering variety of colour schemes, each  
© North Star Military Figures North Star Magazine home page Previous Page Next Page more Africa articles download pdf Click here to order Home Latest North Star Stargrave Frostgrave Oathmark Crusader Artizan Great War Shieldwolf NSA1005 - Matabele Warriors in full Regalia
with its own name - although it is unlikely that even the Zulus  ever had so many beasts that they could provide the whole of  every regiment with matching hides of a distinctive type from  which to make their shields. The Matabele north of the  Limpopo certainly did not, especially as many of their animals  had been stolen from northerners like the Barotse and were  more likely to be of a single fairly uniform colour - generally  reddish brown. Having said all that, I prefer my units to have  distinctive and fairly uniform shields. Even if this is not strictly  accurate for the 1890s, they are intended to represent an army  of any date from about 1870 onwards, which is a good enough  excuse. The best source for Nguni cattle colours is the book by  Poland & Co. cited in the source list below, but admittedly you  have to be a bit sad to go as far as that. A quick and cheap  substitute is the photo gallery on the website of the Nguni  Cattle Breeders’ Society of South Africa, at  www.ngunicattle.info. It is more likely that it was their distinctive headgear that was  used to distinguish the regiments, but unfortunately we do not  have much more data on this subject than we do on shields. The standard type was what Summers and Pagden describe as "an  odd headdress like a pom-pom made from a mass of feathers  stitched to a string net". The feathers were usually trimmed  short, and the effect at a distance would be something like a  small fur busby. Black ostrich or crow plumage was most  popular, but some units wore guineafowl feathers, which are  grey or black, speckled with white. Additional coloured feather  decorations could be added; among those mentioned are white  plumes from the wings or tail of the ostrich (as worn by the  “Imbizo” regiment), the long, narrow blue-grey feathers of the  crane, or the slightly shorter, dark blue or purple ones from the  tail of the roller. (One such bird is still known as "Mzilikazi's  roller" because of the king's liking for these feathers.) The  golden weaver associated with the Amahlogohlogo regiment  mentioned above is quite a small bird with short feathers, so  presumably its plumage formed a pompom rather than being  added as extra adornments. In that case this unit's headgear  would have been a striking yellow or yellowish green colour, or  perhaps these feathers would just have been scattered among  the usual black ones. Bell's painting mentioned above shows an  elaborate arrangement of plumes and pom-poms, but he does  not identify the regiment, and in any case it is unlikely that